After studying the Urantia Book one must deal with a personal question: Is the whole book correct, partially or wrong? Of course, one can take everything by faith and believe it completely. To help make this choice, we will examine some of the scientific information in the book. The scientific information in the book that we will consider was either unknown on earth in 1955 or deferred from the information generally accepted by the earth science of 1955 (year in which the book was published).

Some of this information now matches the revised concepts of science and can be considered predictions of what science would discover after 1955. We will examine these predictions and see how they now agree with science.

These new concordance can increase the credibility of the rest of the Urantia Book because some of the compilers of scientific documents have also compiled other documents. However, we must remember that science currently deals only with the physical world, while the book deals with the physical, spirit, mind and other matters.

Much of the scientific information in the book agrees with the science of 1955 but some differ, the subjects cover fundamental issues such as, the creation of the universe, the creation of our world, the creation of life, fundamentals of energy, etc. Many of these materials cannot be tested in the laboratory. Science theories about these subjects are designed to explain the available evidence. Historically, some theories change over time as science matures, new data becomes available.

Some historians of science claim (5) that new scientific truths succeed when their opponents die, and younger scientists are not personally involved with existing theories. Those disagreements of 1955, which now agree with the changed theories of science, provide a unique way to prove the validity of the scientific part of the Urantia Book. The remaining conflicts may agree in the future, and these could provide additional confirmation of the scientific part of the book. The scientific part of the manuscript was available since 1935, but changes could be made until 1955 (6). We use the date of 1955 for the predictions of the book and considered discoveries made after 1955, the year the book was published.

Disclosure Limitations

The Urantia Book prevents the limitations of the English language to convey some ideas, and these ideas may not have passed clearly or correctly. In addition, there are a number of compilers in the book, and some are more skilled at revelation than others, especially when dealing with information that is unknown. When dealing with future events, the scientific names that will be used in the future may differ and this would hamper identification. For example, the book discusses the "continental sinkhole" on the surface of the earth, while science now speaks of tectonic plates; but there is no problem with the identification in this case.

The book clearly states that there is a limitation of future time for the information that can be disclosed, and the information can only be provided if we discover it ourselves soon. We are not told how soon. This is an understandable restriction of revelation, since there are cases on earth when an advanced culture introduces advanced technology to a less advanced culture; and this generally damages or destroys the less developed culture.

Prediction Analysis

Science may have needed a new theory or improvements to an existing theory, usually because the existing theory disagreed with a new measurement. The new theory begins as an idea in someone's head. We don't know where the idea came from! The idea is changed, expanded, modified, etc., until it appears to meet the necessary data requirements.

When the theory is completed and tested, it is published in scientific newspapers; Scientists in the field learn about it, and the date of publication is generally considered the date of discovery. Then you have to pass the acid test of the experimental verification and reverification by other scientists in the field who compare the old and new theory and informally decide which one best explains the majority of the data. There will perhaps be several years between conception and verification. Even before publication, the idea could be discussed with other experts in the field, and the new information is known to this small group of experts.

We will use the publication date as the discovery date, although the concept has been known by a small group before this. Members of this group could have been unconscious sources of information for the Urantia Book compilers. We will also present greater criticism of some predictions, since it exists in the real world and makes this a more balanced presentation. Science allows improvements and additions to these theories, and these changes have resulted in many of the scientific predictions in the Urantia Book.

Much of our material is science that has been developed after 1955. There are three main categories for predictions,

(I) Those that did not match the science of 1955,

(II) Those that were unknown to science in 1955 and

(III) Those that are now developed.

Most of the material in the three categories involves the science that has been developed within the lifetime of the authors.

Categories I and II cover a wide range of subjects. The seven predictions of categories I and II can be considered remarkable. These predictions disagreed with or were unknown to science in 1955. Since then, science has improved and found new theories and created the agreement. Critics will say that some concepts were known by 1955 by few experts in each field; but the information was not generally known in time or was not proven; and there was no assurance that the work would succeed. There was a risk in revealing new information if it was not true.

This will affect the credibility of the rest of the information in the Urantia Book. Category II is even more remarkable, since these articles were unknown to science in 1955. There is another category of interest, a list of predictions that adds They have not come true category III but some are in development. It would be interesting to see how many of these are done in the future.

The predictions will be listed in three categories, and there will be a brief discussion of each prediction.

I. Predictions that disagreed with science in 1955, and now agree with science:

1. The end of the Cretaceous period and death of dinosaurs.
2. The continental undercut or tectonic plates.
3. Dark matter in the universe

II. Predictions unknown to science in 1955, and now known to science:

1. The large-scale structure of the universe
2. The use of DNA for future human development
3. The DNA came from outer space about 550 million years ago
4. The entire universe is on a plane

III. Predictions still unknown to science

1. The creation of the sun and planets
2. The continuous creation of matter and energy
3. The energy circuits of space
4. Fragmentation of the fifth planet from the sun
5. The organization of matter in seven Super universes
6. The location of the seven Super universes
7. The punctual evolution
8. The origin of the sunspot cycle
9. The twelve planets in the solar system
10. Two unknown types of energy
11. The cause of the wave action of the light particles
12. Speed ​​greater than the speed of light
13. Two kinds of severity
14. Antigravity
15. The largest energy in space
16. The ultimat n
17. The transition from Neanderthal to Cro-magnon
18. Life span of an ordinary star
19. Special conditions required on earth for our type of life

Brief discussion of Individual Predictions

There is much material in the Urantia Book that agrees with science. These cannot be used as predictions. However, there are other subjects that disagreed with science in 1955 and some of these can be used as predictions. (The parentheses show the field of science and the page number of the Urantia Book). Historical scientific information is available in any good modern encyclopedia.

Category I - Predictions that disagreed with science in 1955 and now agree.

1. The end of the Cretaceous period and death of dinosaurs. (Geology, p. 690) The Urantia Book claims that the Cretaceous period ended with one of the greatest volcanic magma flows of all time; It covered several continents. Science originally agreed with this; but later in the twentieth century, science found a new solution unattainable for the problem. The Cretaceous period supposedly ended when a ten-mile-diameter meteorite plunged into the Gulf of Mexico, lifted a cloud of dust and steam for a long time and obscured the sun, swept away much of the plant life in the food chain, and led at the death of many animal species including dinosaurs.

The crucial clue was a thin layer of the metal element iridium on top of the Cretaceous layer. Iridium has been found in few meteorites; There is little on the earth's surface but there are substantial amounts in magmas deep in the earth that could come to the surface during massive magma flows. The meteorite theory was a type of story that populous science could discuss in magazines and newspapers (the Sunday science supplement). It became very popular, but in recent years meteor theory is having problems (1) and magma theory is returning although a large meteoric crater has been found on the floor of the Gulf of Mexico. The question is, which disaster did the most damage to the food chain?

2. The Tectonic Plates or the Continental Socavon (Geology p. 663, 668) The book says that the continents move slowly over the surface of the earth (several inches per year) This was proposed in the first years of the twentieth century and not It had been tested in 1955. However, a look at the east coast of South America and the west coast of Africa quickly shows the ancient setting of the two continents. But science requires proof. And the test came in 1969 by matching the surface of the earth's layers on two separate continents and finding a long break north-south sectioned on the ocean floor between the continents. Another prediction became essentially true even if science calls this tectonic plates.

3. Dark matter in the universe. The visible matter we see in the sky is now thought to be a minor fraction (less than 5%) of the mass (matter) in the universe. The rest of the mass is not visible, and it is referred to as dark matter. It is necessary for its gravitational attraction to keep rotating the galaxies so that they do not tear themselves apart.

The first clue came in the thirties, but it was ignored by astronomers for decades. Recent measurements made to a large number of stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud showed that some stars disappeared for a short time; This clearly implied that some dark matter had moved in front of the missing star. The nature of dark matter is not precisely known. The Urantia Book calls this issue the dark islands of space, and says they are mostly dead suns. Science has to explain why there are so many dead suns.

Category II - Predictions unknown to science in 1955 and now known

1. The large-scale structure of the universe. In the thirties, astronomy books said that galaxies were evenly distributed throughout space. This was based on the relatively short distances that the telescopes were able to see. Modern long-range telescopes can observe matter that is believed to be billions of light years (distance that light travels in a year, about 6 billion miles). Studies of relative movements of distant galaxies beyond the constellation Virgo show what appears to be a center of mass gravity (the Virgo cluster) that is around 50 million light years and attracts hundreds of galaxies.

This structure tends to be somewhat flattened. The Milky Way is remote from the center of this structure; The complete structure is called Virgo Super Cluster. This sounds like a larger sector discussed in the Urantia Book. Astronomers have found even a larger structure (the Great Attractor) that could be the center of our Super universe. This is a subject that science only discovered recently. The Urantia Book was clearly years ahead of its time. (See Community Herald, Vol. 2, # 1 1999-2000 for detailed information) or article two cosmologies.

2. DNA for the future development of the human race (Genetics Page 734) The Urantia Book says that the human race has developed slowly by evolution, and by some interspeciations with a pair of racial improvers, Adam and Eve. The book also says that future human development will come from technical developments, rather than evolution. Since we are beginning to understand the molecular structure of human DNA, it is highly likely that this will be used technologically.

3. The Origin of DNA in Urantia (Biochemistry Page 396, 397) Science claims to have found that simple, individual cell and that life could have started here more than 3 billion years ago; but there was little evolution for almost 3 billion years. Nothing changed until DNA appeared in living cells about 550 million years ago. This is when evolution began! The question is "Where did the DNA come from?"

Scientists have not found a trace of it here before 550 million years, have been unable to do so by scribbling it instead of copying it in the laboratory, and are seriously exploring the possibility that it has accidentally arrived here from outer space - perhaps in a meteorite.

The Urantia Book also says that it arrived here about 550 million years ago slowly outside; but the life of DNA was deliberately implanted in three saltwater locations on Urantia by spiritual beings called the bearers of life. Two implants were successful and developed in all life forms on our planet, Urantia.

4. The large-scale structure of the universe is flat. (P. 124) Recent measurements of old infrared radiation fields are very uniform; This is indicative of a flat structure. Any curved structure would introduce ununiformities. The Urantia Book says that the flat structure becomes thick at the outer end. It is difficult to justify a flat universe coming out of the Great Explosion that expands in all directions.

Category III - Possible future predictions that could come true.

1. The creation of the Sun and the Planets (Cosmology, Star Physics, p. 651) Science says that the sun was created when a huge cloud of hydrogen gas contracted by gravity and heated itself by the compression of the gas until It was hot enough to become a solar oven (10 million degrees Celsius.) The book says the same thing except that there were over a hundred thousand other suns that were also created from the same huge Andronover nebula. Its creation took about two billion years, and they were expelled from the nebula after their formation. The side effects of this energy disturbance are being studied and used by science to justify the theory of the Big Bang. Science does not know about another hundred thousand suns or the nebula or the expulsion of the suns from the nebula.

But the sun was a lonely body, without planets. However, another nebula passed "close" and pulled enough matter from the sun to form all the planets and more. This took half a million years. Much of the matter was recovered by the sun, but the remnant formed the planets of the solar system. The largest planets formed first, then the smallest. This concept explains why the plane of the planets is inclined seven degrees by being perpendicular to the axis of the sun. Science speaks of a similar event, but the disk of matter that formed the planets was formed at the same time as the sun. In this case, the plane of the planets should be perpendicular to the axis of the sun and it is not.

2. The creation of matter and energy. (Cosmology, Physics, p. 49, 55, 468) The book says that energy is continuously being created in a central place, is lowered and transferred by circuits of energy throughout the universe; and matter is being created from energy in many places especially beyond the seven Super universes. Science has a discredited theory about continuous creation, but the theory accepted today is that all the energy in our universe was created ten or fifteen billion years ago in an instant and in a place. Nothing has been said about the source of energy, although the conservation of energy is a major principle of physics.

This event is explained by the theory of the Big Bang. This energy has been cooling and spreading since then, and created the entire universe. Interestingly, some of the newest experimental results are raising questions about the Big Bang. The Urantia Book speaks of a huge disturbance of energy in our part of the universe six or eight billion years ago, which could have been a great local explosion; whose subsequent effects could have been assumed as remnants of the Great Explosion. The Urantia Book does not speak of a Great Explosion.

3. Space energy circuits. (P. 177) If there was no Great Explosion, what is the source of energy to operate the universe? The Urantia Book speaks of a central source of energy and energy circuits to distribute energy throughout the universe. The energy circuits go from the Central Source to the main centers of mass, Super universes, then descend to smaller structures of mass to finally reach the individual stars. The energy circuits also degrade energy so that the energy of our sun is the physical energy that our life system is able to use.

4. Fragmentation of the fifth planet from the sun. (Astronomy, Cosmology, Pg. 658) The book says that the fifth planet from the sun was slowly attracted by the gravity of the sixth giant planet, J piter. When it was close enough, the gravity of J piter tore the fifth planet to create the band of asteroids between Mars and J piter. Science now says that there was never a fifth planet, and that asteroids are pieces of spatial matter (planetesimals) that never formed a planet. Earth Chronicles (3) claims that a planetary collision destroyed the fifth planet and created the asteroids.

Number of Inhabited Worlds

Name in the Urantia Book

World Scientific Name

1 world

ours Urantia

Earth

1, 000 or less

system

Constellation visible

100, 000

constellation

local neighborhood

10 million

local universe

1 Billion

minor sector

Milky Way, galaxy

100 billion

major sector

galaxy cluster

1 billion

Super universe

Super module

7 billion

the great universe

Universe

5. Organization of the subject in the Super universes. (Astronomy, Pg. 167, 168) The book describes the organization of matter in a super universe. Science knows about this information, but doesn't know it all. In fact, science doesn't know even about super universes. The book says that science will discover some of this information soon. The table above compares the equivalent information between science and The Urantia Book. The first column lists the criteria of the book by the number of worlds inhabited in various parts of a super universe the other columns self-explain, although the scientific name does not match the name in the Urantia Book. There is a question, whether the Milky Way is a local universe or a minor sector of a super universe, but we believe that the Urantia Book seems to imply that it is a minor sector.

The Urantia book implies that most stars have no planets, and that is why the number of inhabited planets is much smaller than the number of suns. Our conjecture is that there is a planet inhabited by 100 stars of all types. (see Herald of the Community, Vol. 2, # 1)

6. The location of the seven super universes in the great universe. (Astronomy, p. 164, 165) The book describes the seven super universes circulating around a central universe in a flat elliptical ring that thickens at the outer edges. He also says that science has almost found super universe number seven and will find the rest soon. In 1935, science thought that galaxies were evenly distributed across space instead of being in a thick "pancake." The existence of large gaps between some galaxies and the gravitational clusters of galaxies have only recently been discovered. This also has the opportunity to come true.

7. Timely evolution. Fossil evidence is showing that some species appeared almost "instantaneously" instead of slowly evolving. But fossil evidence does not say that it represents such a short "instantaneous" time. This is becoming accepted among evolutionists with the understanding that instantly many generations can be. The Urantia Book discusses several of these rapid appearances in the evolutionary section of life. The book talks about the appearance of the main human modifications in a generation. This concept may become more accepted over time, and this prediction may be beginning to come true.

8. The origin of the sunspot cycle. (Astronomy, p. 459, 656) The book says that our eleven-year sunspot cycle is a very slow remnant of the short time (3.5 days) of the Cepheid variable phase of the sun. (The Cepheid phase of a star is a cyclic variation of a star's brilliance, and the frequency of the variation and the brightness are related.)

Although science does not claim above, it is plausible. A study would require precise measurements of star brightness at a very long term of the Cepheid variable of low brightness and precise, space-based, long-term measurements of the variations in sun brightness. Since the eleven-year sunspot cycle shows a variation in the number of dark sunspots, these dark sunspots could reduce the emission of sunlight.

9. The twelve planets in our solar system. (Astronomy, p. 656) While science knows the nine planets and the remaining or pre-planetesimals of a tenth, the book says that there are twelve planets in the solar family, with five beyond Saturn. Astronomers are currently looking for outer planets by monitoring very small changes in the movements of known outer planets, which could be caused by the gravity of two distant planets. The two space probes that are traveling beyond Pluto, Pioneer 10 and 11, are also being monitored for small changes that could be caused by the gravity of another planet or two (see Section "Planet X-Nibiru"). However, if the two planets were in parts of their orbits far from the space probes, they would have little effect.

10. Two types of energy unknown. (Physics, p. 474) The book discusses all types of electromagnetic radiation known to science. It also discusses two other types of higher energy radiation that science does not know. One is called infraultimatonic rays and is involved in the first stage of the created energy. The other is called ultimatonic rays and involves the conversion of energy to ultimaton particles (See sixteen prediction in this section.) Some of the experimental work with higher energy machines could lead to the discovery of these rays.

11. The cause of the wave action of the light particles. (Physics, p. 461) The book and science say that light consists of particles; but the Urantia Book speaks of another energy, unknown on earth, that acts on light, causes the particles to knot in a waveform. Science knows that light has wave and particle properties, but it does not know why wave properties exist.

12. Speed ​​greater than the speed of light. (Physics, Theology, p. 260) Science maintains that a physical body cannot move faster than the speed of light. The book discusses speeds greater than the speed of light, but could be talking about spiritual matter instead of physics. You might be considering matter that is not affected by linear (conventional) gravity.

13. Two kinds of gravity. (Physics, p. 125) Science is familiar with the gravitational attraction between two physical bodies, but does not understand the cause. The book calls this linear gravity. It also speaks of radial gravity, which apparently works between the central universe and other bodies such as the free ultimatons, (article 16) and between the central universe and energy. Does this mean that ultimatons are involved in the generation of a linear gravitational field? Science has conducted very difficult experiments to see if linear gravity affects light energy. It does, but there could be enough discrepancy to compute another type of severity.

14. Antigravity. (Physics, p. 101) The book discusses antigravity and some particles that are affected by it. Science speculates that antigravity may exist, but has few ideas about it.

15. The greatest energy of space. (Physics, p.467) The book says that light and electricity are not the main energies of space. Apparently neither is gravity. The book says what science did not know in 1955. This energy apparently flows through circuit space. In addition, science does not yet know about these circuits.

16. The ultimaton particle. (Physics, p. 465, 467, 472, 473, 476) The book discusses the fundamental particle, the ultimaton. This is the first mass particle that is created from energy. One hundred delayed ultimatons make an electron, but they don't use motion orbits like electrons, the ultimatons make clusters. Maybe some kind of shell structure is involved. Science has no idea that electrons are made of smaller particles. The speed of the Ultimatons could exceed the speed of light because the ultimatons are not affected by linear gravity.

17. The transition from Neanderthal to Cro-magnon. (Anthropology, p. 890) Science is aware that it was a relatively rapid change from the Neanderthal type of humans to Cro-magnon or modern man about 35, 000 years ago. Science does not know why this happened so quickly, since slow evolution does not have such a rapid transition. The book says that the descendants of superior aliens, that is, Adam and Eve, crossed over with stone-land indigenous peoples to create some modern men, who erased the Neanderthals. The Neanderthals and the Cro-magnon had existed on a par for thousands of years. Something happened to cause this change.

18. Life span of an ordinary star. (Stellar physics, p. 172, 465) The book says that an ordinary star, like the sun, can shine for billions of years. Science also calculates that a star can generate enough energy to shine for billions of years. But the book says that the stars that are in the mainstream of the space energy circuit can acquire more energy and shine indefinitely. On page 172, the book claims such stellar life for billions of years. The existence of a special flow of space energy is unknown to science, and also the existence of flow channels for this energy.

19. Special conditions required on earth for our type of life. (P. 665) Our type of life requires very special conditions on earth (6) Things such as temperature, an atmosphere with the appropriate chemistry and pressure, eyes with the combined sensitivity to the light emitted by the sun, make it possible life for creatures such as us. The book speaks of fifty thousand of these conditions. The probability of the accidental origin of life is extremely small.

Summary:

The two dozen predictions discussed involve subjects that science developed or discovered after 1955, most of these predictions come from the following Urantia documents: 12, The Universe of Universes: 15, The Seven Super universes: 41, Physical Aspects of Universo Local: 42, Energía – Mente y Materia: 57, Origen de Urantia: 58, Establecimiento de la Vida en Urantia. Una tabulación de resultados sigue:

Categoría I. Predicciones que estaban en desacuerdo con la ciencia en 1955, y ahora están de acuerdo – tres predicciones que ahora están de acuerdo con la ciencia.

Categoría II. Predicciones que eran desconocidas para la ciencia en 1955 – cinco predicciones ahora conocidas para la ciencia.

Categoría III. Predicciones aún desconocidas para la ciencia – diecinueve predicciones en los trabajos.

Las predicciones que han sido analizadas en este capitulo son las más fáciles al juzgar de los autores. Cubren las materias de la Física, la cosmología, la energía, etc. Hay mas análisis que pueden ser hechos por expertos en otros campos, y en años posteriores cuando mas predicciones se hagan realidad. La categoría I puede ser considerada notable para 1955. Esta información estaba en desacuerdo con la ciencia en 1955, pero 45 años más tarde hay un acuerdo debido a los cambios en las teorías científicas.

Sin embargo, puesto que el libro fue publicado en 1955, estamos buscando materias que cambiaron después de esa fecha. Estas predicciones están de acuerdo obviamente con el Libro de Urantia requisito que la revelación esté limitada a la información que descubriremos en un futuro cercano. Esto muestra que alguna de la información técnica avanzada en el Libro de Urantia está correcta. Los compiladores tuvieron acceso a la información que era desconocida para la mente humana en 1955. Esto es mostrado mas aún en la categoría II que son predicciones que la ciencia no conocía en 1955. Además, la información viene de un número de compiladores que cubre un número de campos de la ciencia.

Las predicciones notables de esta categoría hacen más fácil creer algo del otro material en el libro. Los compiladores de algunos de los documentos de ciencia también compilaron otros documentos. La categoría III tiene predicciones que aún son desconocidas para la ciencia, pero algunas de estas son materias fundamentales, y los datos científicos son a menudo desparramados. Esto no quiere decir que las predicciones de la categoría III estén equivocadas. Tendremos que esperar y ver que las predicciones se hagan realidad.

El libro dice que el conocimiento personal de Dios viene a trav s del esp ritu, y la ciencia ahora no puede ayudar con eso. La ciencia le permite a uno ver sobre el hombro de Dios y ver como trabaja parte de Su universo, pero uno no encuentra un Dios personal en la ciencia. Cu l es el significado de estas predicciones? Por qu pasar por todo el problema? Especialmente puesto que el error podr a arriesgar la credibilidad del resto del libro.

Esto parece ser un esfuerzo deliberado para ense arnos algo de ciencia avanzada. Quiz fue en respuesta a algunas de las preguntas de los miembros del foro. Los cient ficos no creer n el Libro de Urantia porque encontrar n la verdad por ellos mismos y la probar n! Pero podr a haber algunas pistas interesantes a donde mirar.

Algo de la informaci n es casi ciencia muy fundamental. Sabemos muy poco de ciencia fundamental tal como carga el ctrica, gravedad, part culas fundamentales y la fuente de energ a en el universo. El Libro de Urantia discute algunos de estos asuntos. Hay otras materias que son discutidas en el libro que podr an ser tratables para an lisis de predicci n. Estas incluyen material tal como esp ritu, mente, el monitor misterioso, ciencia social, etc. Estas deben ser peinadas para tratar de encontrar material objetivo que pudiera ser nuevo o predictivo. M s probable, tal informaci n ser subjetiva, y esta clase de material es muy dif cil de substanciar. Sin embargo, los resultados podr an ser de gran inter s para otros lectores. No necesariamente probar an lo correcto de otras partes del libro.

La revelaci n podr a no ser absoluta verdad pero est combinada a las necesidades y entendimiento de aquellos que la recibieron. Podr a no cubrir completamente la materia, y podr aa n omitir partes principales de la materia. No proveer informaci n que se har til en un futuro lejano. El an lisis de las predicciones ha presentado una visi n interesante de la ciencia revelada. Esto podr a ser til a todos los lectores, puesto que a ade el factor de verdad revelada a algo del material cient fico en el libro, e implica que el resto del libro es m s cre ble. Un pedazo final de consejo. Alguna ayuda en el entendimiento de El Libro de Urantia son repetici n, pensamiento y no leer el libro secuencialmente. Empezar y leer lo que puedas entender; entonces regresa y estudia las otras partes.

Irwin Ginsburg es un doctor en F sica. Su libro, El Primer Hombre! El Ad n, fue publicado por Sim ny Schuster. Entre las cartas que recibi de los lectores, hubo varias que suger an que l hab a le do El Libro de Urantia. Esto es como, el dice, el libro lo encontr a l . Ha sido lector por veinte a os, y escribe comentarios sobre ciencia y El Libro de Urantia.

References:

1. Officer, C, and Page, J. (1996) La Controversia de la Gran Extinci n de los Dinosaurios. Addison, Wesley. New York, NY

2. Neubauer, PE y Neubauer, A. (1995) La huella pulgar de la naturaleza. Addison- Wesley, New York, NY

3. Sitchin, Zecharia. Las Cr nicas de la Tierra 5 vols. Avon books. New York, NY Esta es una nueva interpretaci n de antiguos textos sumerios con algunas pistas para la ciencia del siglo veinte.

4. Root y Bernstein. (1989). Descubriendo. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

5. Block, Matthew. Communicaci n Privada

6. Ross, H, Cosmos y el Creador (1995) Navpress, Colorado Springs, Co.