One of the science issues in vogue today is about the origin of the Universe, of the physical Universe. It is clear that this is not a matter only for experimental science, particularly for Astrophysics, but, and, above all, for Philosophy, speculative science.
It may seem silly, but, reflecting how much to the discussed and moments or subject, it seems to us that the differences between the various theories, up to now raised, are justified, by the simple fact that they are constructed Where the truth will never be.
Notwithstanding the great advance of science in that field, in its organic research, its progress is also necessary in the field of experimentation and extra physical analysis. .
With a view to the infinity of the Universe which, in addition to that, insists on permanent and intrepid expansion, it does not induce that a hand of inadequate methods has been launched in the persecution. of the objective sought, that is, of your knowledge?
As far as the expansion of the Universe is concerned, the thought that most closely approximates cosmic reality, and with which the Spiritist Doctrine agrees, is inserted in The Great Synthesis, when he states:
The movement that exists in the Universe is never a unilateral, effective and definitive displacement, but half of a cycle that returns to the starting point after having determined to become, a vibration n round trip, complete in its inverse and complementary counterpart. As the spiral, which was once opened, now closes; the return pulse completes the cycle initiated by the outbound.
All this does not lead us to the logical and final equation of the Universe being conceived and concretized by someone?! Someone must, first, have conceived it, and then materialize it. And who would that someone be? The work says of its author. If the work says of its author, who would be the author of that work, the Universe?
There is no doubt that the search for the origin of the Universe, of the work, involves its author. The search for the origin of the Universe implies, therefore, necessarily in the search also of its author, under penalty of claiming an incomplete procedure.
On the other hand, the investigation of the origin of the Universe must also involve the investigation of its extension. Therefore, the search for the origin of the Universe must also involve the search for its extension and, consequently, for its author. Hence, it is possible, then, to suspect that the scientific methods used up to now, with their respectable theories, relative to the origin of the Universe and its extension, are hiding along tortuous paths.
It is of good logic that the scientific methods used in the investigations of the matter, in their various gradations, cannot be the same that would be used in investigations in the field of antimatéria, or field of imponderability, which is not detected by the scientific research instruments, no matter how sophisticated they are, because they are located in addition to three-dimensionality.
If you seek to discover the origin of the Universe, well its extension and if that search also imposes on its author, the methods have to be necessarily others: not only the methods taken by scientists, according to tradition, it is agreed, but more purified and complex methods, capable of exploring and detecting the duplex nature of all beings and of all things, that is, not only in regard to matter, but also to antimatéria, or spiritual principle.
It is no longer secret to scientists that natural phenomena that have not yet been detected by the most perfected devices do not, therefore, cease to exist. They continue to challenge the scientific mind of this century and, perhaps, of the entire millennium that begins, until there is, on the part of official science, compliance with methods capable of proving their existence and authorship ...
Author: Weimar Muniz de Oliveira
Source: Diário da Manhã, link:
http://www.dm.com.br/impresso/7791/opiniao/66175, universo_fisico_e__universo_psiquico_i
