Maybe this title caught your attention for confusing. Or maybe by singular. But the question is really very clear. Is science itself capable of confirming that astrology is also a science itself ? Some studies confirm this.
In fact, minds of great importance in the history of civilizations already trusted astrology. And we don't just mean characters like Ronald Reagan or Queen Elizabeth of England. There are also names such as Plato, Francis Bacon, Isaac Newton or Carl G. Jung .
So, is there really a magnificent influence of the stars and planets that describes the human personality according to the day it is born ? Or are we to walk towards the Jungian idea of intuitive synchronicity that we find in the archetypes that are reflected in the constellations of the cosmos?
Studies confirming astrology as a science
The truth is that even today, there are still studies that end up referring to astrology as a science. Although they go unnoticed for the scientific community, and sometimes also for the esoteric, they are still a reality.
It is evident that astrology has suffered huge setbacks with the wave of telephone guessing devices that little or nothing have to contribute to this science . However, there are still other personalities like Alejandro Jodorowsky capable of demonstrating that in tarot, for example, it has a lot to offer if you work from the right prism.
This line of thought takes us to a study at Vanderbilt University, in Nashville, Tennessee, in the United States. According to the research carried out by various scientists, astrology would have a clear scientific basis .
In this case, groups of mice were genetically modified. Then they were exposed to various winter and summer seasons artificially. In this way it was observed that according to the time in which they were born, they showed different conditions and dispositions. For example, decreased activity was observed during the day.
This means that there is a seasonal biology. In this way, people born in winter show a greater predisposition to suffer neurological disorders.
But it is also true and one thing needs to be clarified. This study does not show that the position of the planets influences human predisposition. However, it does show that the situation in our world is important and will clearly affect the personality of an individual . That is, there are certain characteristics that will remain as imprint on the personality of a person according to the day he is born.
More science defending astrology
Astronomers like Percy Seymour, of the Royal Astronomical Society, do believe that there is a physical effect on humans according to the position of the planets . For this scientist, the influence of the solar magnetic field, as well as that of other worlds adjacent to the Earth, affect the personality of man.
We must not forget that the balance of the Solar System is total . Each movement of one planet affects the others. After all, the magnetic fields of worlds like Jupiter or Saturn have different effects in our cosmic neighborhood. Moreover, even the influence of the Moon powerfully affects female menstrual cycles, agriculture, tides ...
Thus, for Seymour the fetus in the womb receives magnetic signals . These arrive through the nervous system, which would be the receiving antenna. In addition, until birth would act as a trigger according to the imprint received by the position of the planets.
Obviously, this is a topic that raises thorns among the global scientific community . Can astrology really be considered a science? More and more evidence seems to indicate yes. However, there is no doubt that quackery does a lot of damage. But who knows, maybe one day we will find the right educational balance so that everything is in its right measure where it belongs .
Seen in pajamasurf, by Pedro, editor of the Great White Brotherhood
